设为首页收藏本站

爱吱声

 找回密码
 注册
搜索

tag 标签: 2010

相关日志

分享 office 2010 or office 2013?
热度 9 tanis 2013-3-24 11:11
office 2010 or office 2013?
感觉office 2007有点跟不上时代了,貌似对64位的系统也莫有什么优化。而且我的outlook经常莫名其妙的的当机。 听说office 2013是个不小的进步。不过貌似D版不多? 请问各位坛友有什么建议
100 次阅读|35 个评论
分享 资料收集0314-Super PAC---金钱如何控制选举
热度 4 南方有嘉木 2012-3-15 03:18
The "superPAC" is a relatively new beast that emerged as a result of two court rulings, including an important 2010 ruling by the Supreme Court. The "superPAC", which is officially known as an "independent expenditure-only committee", has become an increasingly popular method of influence for special interest groups. The "superPAC" is like a traditional PAC (Political Action Committee) without many of the restrictions. For instance, a "superPAC" can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money for the sole purpose of supporting or opposing political candidates. A "superPAC" can directly attack a political candidate. The only caveat is that a "superPAC" is not allowed to coordinate directly with candidates or political parties. The "superPAC" will be an extremely crucial part of the 2012 Presidential election. History of PACs In 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt called for campaign finance reform . This led to laws called Acts of Congress intended to: Limit the influence of wealthy individuals and special interest groups ; Regulate campaign spending; and Deter abuses by mandating public disclosure. In 1971, Congress passed the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA). This Act further defined how a PAC could operate. In the 1972 presidential election abuses still occurred. However, there was no regulatory group to enforce the Act. Congress in 1974 set limits on contributions to PACs and established the Federal Election Commission (FEC). In brief, FEC rules include: A limit for individuals to $5,000 per year for Federal PACs; Corporations and unions may not contribute directly to federal PACs, but can for the administrative costs of a PAC affiliated with the specific corporation or union; Corporate-affiliated PACs may only solicit contributions from executives, shareholders, and their families; Contributions from corporate or labor union treasuries are illegal, though they may sponsor a PAC and provide financial support for its administration and fundraising; Union-affiliated PACs may only solicit contributions from members; Independent PACs may solicit contributions from the general public and pay their own costs. Federal multi-candidate PACs were limited as follows: $5,000 per candidate for each election and primary; $15,000 per political party per year; and $5,000 per PAC per year. In 2000, nearly unlimited spending continued. The billionaire Wyly brothers of Texas "played an instrumental role" when helping their desired candidate Texas Republican George W. Bush via a $2.5-million advertising campaign they financed via a 527 organization . In the 2004 presidential election , campaign donations were via a 527 organization . One organization, Swift Boat "torpedoed" Massachusetts Democrat John Kerry presidential campaign, 2004 and George W. Bush was elected to a second term. A reported $9.45 million came from three private individuals. Swift Boat's was cited as a front group for Republican interests. Details of the influence of wealthy individuals to control the course of elections became more clear in reports like one that documented the Wyly Brothers of Texas alone had made millions in campaign contributions to 200 Republican Candidates. In the 2010 case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , the Supreme Court ruled PACs may accept unlimited contributions from individuals, unions, and corporations (both for profit and not-for-profit) for the purpose of making independent expenditures. The 2010 ruling made it legal for corporations and unions to spend from their general treasuries to finance independent expenditures. Because direct corporate or union contributions to federal campaigns are still prohibited, such organizations seeking to contribute to federal candidate campaigns must still rely on traditional PACs for that purpose. However, they may spend money independently of campaigns without forming a PAC. During the 2012 election cycle, the exact boundary that defines when a campaign contribution is truly independent versus a coordinated one was lampooned on comedy shows, debated publicly and became the subject of additional Federal Court cases.
个人分类: 资料收集|17 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之六)
热度 4 边寒剑 2011-12-13 18:26
这个是kate patty的一首歌的现场表演,我不清楚到底是在第一二系列之间还是第二三系列之间,但是太有劲暴力了,后面的模特们也都手舞足蹈起来了。 我一共上传了五个系列,只有第五系列的荒野系列我没有上传,因为我觉得那首歌不是很好听,而且效果不如另外五个系列有感染力,所以就把这首歌的现场演唱补上吧。 Kate patty 的firework http://www.tudou.com/v/eaFHeQWwwiY/rpid=102658956/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|597 次阅读|1 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之五)(我认为最精彩的) ...
热度 1 边寒剑 2011-12-13 18:20
这个是这个表演的最后部分,也是我认为最最美丽和精彩的,尤其是最后连模特们都疯狂了,在外面象开启了舞会。 背景音乐实在是过于精彩,是kate patty 的(teenage dream 和 califonia girls) http://www.tudou.com/v/b3vM2QHYuu8/rpid=102658956/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|497 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之四)
热度 2 边寒剑 2011-12-13 17:40
这一段我也不清楚到底是应该是否是第二系列,不过很唯美,而且背景音乐很很好听 (背景音乐:what you are) http://www.tudou.com/v/GgY20AryP9U/rpid=102658956/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|582 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之三)
热度 5 边寒剑 2011-12-13 09:04
这个其实应该是第一个,因为这个是维多利亚的秘密2010 的第一部分,也就是开头,但是我觉得相对来说,它的震撼力不如lady gaga配乐的第三部份体育系列,所以就把这一部分放在了第三(但我认为最漂亮、最精彩的是最后的圣诞部分,目前我还在剪辑中)。 我想说的是,2011年除夕时候中央台播放春晚,而旅游卫视就放这个(还有micheal jackson的演唱会),维多利亚的秘密的第一部分的这个开头,其震撼力虽然不如体育系列,不过也总比冯巩的小品的热场效果要强得多,呵呵。 (背景歌曲名《stay too long》) http://www.tudou.com/v/IsuB5JXE1nc/autoPlay=true/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|632 次阅读|1 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之二)
热度 2 边寒剑 2011-12-13 08:52
这个部分是天使系列,不光模特漂亮,现场的akon唱的angel也太他妈配合场面了。(这个是整个六个系列的第四部分) http://www.tudou.com/v/9CTeB10smdc/autoPlay=true/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|450 次阅读|0 个评论
分享 最最精彩的表演,维多利亚的秘密2010 片段(六之一)
热度 6 边寒剑 2011-12-13 08:46
这个是我看过的最最精彩的表演,其中有六个片段是最漂亮的。 主要是不光模特漂亮,而且主主要的是后面的配乐歌曲实在也是太好听了,太配合了。 下面是其中之一,维多利亚的秘密之体育系列,后面用的体操运动员的加入真是他妈的神来之笔,(配乐是lady gaga的bad romance http://www.tudou.com/v/gZ3mmqhzoJ4/autoPlay=true/v.swf
个人分类: 魅力|593 次阅读|1 个评论

手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|网站错误报告|爱吱声   

GMT+8, 2024-9-20 21:32 , Processed in 0.027863 second(s), 22 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部