哈哈， 马斯克成了军事博主，关于F35

四角池

@晨枫 好像之前有过相似的结论。
（这个10年前的编辑器似乎不支持h5 和 markdown）

作为 DOGE部长，军机处行走，。马斯克对f35战机做了如下判断。：

Meanwhile, some idiots are still building manned fighter jets like the F-35
与此同时，一些白痴仍在建造 F-35 等载人战斗机

网民反驳：
F-35 can fly much much higher, much much faster, for an exponentially longer time (can cover around 3200km without mid air refuelling and without external fuel tanks), and most importantly, can carry highly advanced air to air and air to ground munitions. This is a shockingly dumb take for someone like you.
F-35 可以飞得更高、更快、飞行时间呈指数级增长（无需空中加油和外部油箱即可飞行约 3200 公里），最重要的是，可以携带高度先进的空对空和空对地弹药。对于像你这样的人来说，这是一个令人震惊的愚蠢行为。
You have no idea what you're talking about. Show me 1 drone with the capabilities of an f35. Offensive defensive, range and independence. Give me full specs. Elon is referencing the precise drones he shared in the video. These are fpv drones. They can't even carry 1 gravity GBU small bomb.
你不知道你在说什么。向我展示 1 架具有 f35 功能的无人机。进攻、防守、射程和独立性。给我完整的规格。埃隆指的是他在视频中分享的精确无人机。这些是 fpv 无人机。他们甚至不能携带1个重力GBU小型炸弹。

马斯克：
It’s a shit design
这真是个狗屎设计

另外一个投资大佬  。Adresseen也来凑热闹：
A declassified Pentagon comprehensive test report of Lockheed Martin Corp.’s F-35 warplane, America's most expensive weapons system, reveals that six years of combat testing has been marred by reliability and maintenance delays, guns that don't shoot straight and unresolved concerns about cyber defense capabilities.

马斯克的总结：。
The F-35 design was broken at the requirements level, because it was required to be too many things to too many people.
This made it an expensive & complex jack of all trades, master of none. Success was never in the set of possible outcomes.

And manned fighter jets are obsolete in the age of drones anyway. Will just get pilots killed.
F-35 的设计在需求层面就被打破了，因为它需要为太多的人提供太多的东西。
这使得它成为一种昂贵且复杂的万能千斤顶，无一不是大师。成功从来不在于一系列可能的结果。
无论如何，载人战斗机在无人机时代已经过时了。只会害死飞行员。

四角池

标题可能有些错误， 他可能还真不是军事博主，有点军机处钦差大臣的意思啊：
====推文=========
Elon Musk @elonmusk
6:25 AM · Nov 26, 2024   19.8MViews
Exactly.
In a meeting with senior military officers today, they told me that it now takes longer to renovate stairs (24 months) in the Pentagon than it took to build the WHOLE Pentagon (16 months) in the 1940s!!
在今天与高级军官的会议上，他们告诉我，现在翻新五角大楼楼梯（24 个月）的时间比 20 世纪 40 年代建造整个五角大楼（16 个月）的时间还要长！

testjhy

估计这小子利用还没到手的权力看到部分内幕材料，准备从航天切入航空了，

数值分析

testjhy 发表于 2024-11-27 06:17
估计这小子利用还没到手的权力看到部分内幕材料，准备从航天切入航空了， ...

问题是他真懂项目管理，很可能真的整点什么出来。。。

testjhy

数值分析 发表于 2024-11-27 14:22
问题是他真懂项目管理，很可能真的整点什么出来。。。

做军机？象航发之类的不是一蹴而就的，如果收编几大主力军机厂核心技术人员，瞄着类似F35整机是不是有机会？

晨枫

他的错误在于：自动化的终点不是无人化。

无人机能补充有人机，但不代替有人机。