8 x$ V* e0 r$ b: f V# W# O0 Q可怜中国学经济学的学生们（也包括我）从那些教科书里学来，以为这个东西就是解释经济危机的永恒不变的真理，由此推出收入不公导致消费不足，消费不足导致经济危机，要消除经济危机就要消除分配不公。要消除分配不公就要革命或印钞票的教条主义。遇到经济危机，就不分青红皂白是分配不公造成的，无非想证明资本主义就是糟。所以，解决方案要不就是推翻政府，要不就是鼓励政府扩大支出。 4 _& C. r# H5 ~' Y! Q+ e; q" r# w" j# z5 p( R/ `8 z
那么为何人民公社一大二公的结果中国少了4000万人口呢？最公平的时代就是最荒唐的时代。! S" n6 \( y0 D* C9 F6 I
# g* z9 o3 P" K
过尤不及，实事求是。* F' M2 M0 w& `& I) i! ]$ z- i
$ }+ |- ? \* {% h1 U! [3 b. f0 \7 ^9 |, F) M- ^$ X7 n$ G
Birmingham School (economics)From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia / V( l& a) z% y l4 A 8 l5 ?5 u2 R9 ~Jump to: navigation, search , v' Z: `5 O0 Z' iThe Birmingham School was a school of economic thought that emerged in Birmingham, England during the early nineteenth century, specifically in the Post-Napoleonic depression that affected England 1815–30, following the end of the Napoleonic wars in 1815.6 c6 I( D F. \8 [+ F# N l. L
Arguing an underconsumptionist theory – specifically, attributing the depression to the fall in demand due to the end of the wars and end of war mobilization – Birmingham School economists opposed the gold standard and advocated the use of an expansionary monetary policy to achieve full employment. F+ c u, r E; t
The leading thinker and spokesman for the Birmingham School was the banker Thomas Attwood. Other notable figures included George Frederick Muntz and Thomas Attwood's brother Matthias Attwood. Economists who lent the Birmingham School some support included Arthur Young, Patrick Colquhoun and Sir John Sinclair.[1] + d4 L# I" g* O6 k. E9 Q4 I8 N7 \+ x6 fDismissed at the time as "currency cranks" or "crude inflationists", the theories of the Birmingham School are now recognized as embryonic versions of the Keynesian economics of the 1930s.[2] Some of Attwood's writings contain formulations of the multiplier effect and an income-expenditure model.[3]Joseph Schumpeter, in his 1954 History of Economic Analysis wrote that "it is from these writings that any study of modern ideas on monetary management ought to start".[4] ) M7 ^ P* U4 N6 R$ D- H6 n( Q2 H & J. T! e+ c, |2 w y, _: G% U$ H4 o; C6 r
8 ?' w) O1 I9 I. F/ `% K1 w
6 N% S- q4 a4 ]8 L# K- l 作者: darkingwing 时间: 2011-6-26 17:22 回复 万里风中虎 的帖子, l2 t3 N4 w4 G5 A
0 |/ {2 j( j1 H8 ?* X2 {- C2 r( T
经济危机只是表现了人类追求稳定繁荣的目的与经济状况实际的背离，至于为什么背离...讨论这个问题无法脱开具体的社会结构和历史现实...只是想说，这个问题不可能有一劳永逸的解答...作者: 万里风中虎 时间: 2011-6-26 19:48 本帖最后由 万里风中虎 于 2011-6-26 19:57 编辑 . x2 h+ s( g4 j" R
, a, k. W6 g3 {! G& G 回复 darkingwing 的帖子4 p4 A/ m" y# R' J
