+ y9 Q4 H, {6 T, r5 G) [) c( o) e4 T8 U/ R
Chinese released water at high speed; charged, pushed Indian Army personnel and many fell into river, says official.0 D8 [2 V: X& x% f* n# x) {
4 M1 E- A* s' @& ]* \6 p- h% O* HThe Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) meticulously planned the attack on Indian troops in eastern Ladakh’s Galwan for at least two days, a senior government official said.3 A5 ]2 ?, N. M ~. l4 ~: j1 \
' ^0 ]' z- s* i2 m' S* H6 v$ `The Chinese blocked small rivulets in heightened areas, releasing water at high speed when Indian Army personnel appeared at the disputed site in Galwan area on June 15. “The strong gush of water made the men lose balance. The Chinese charged, pushed the Army personnel and many fell into the Galwan river,” the official said.. r* Q% j/ K8 _
% K1 i) w" c( M# p% VThe Chinese did a reconnaissance by flying unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to see the strength of the Indian troops and accordingly bolstered their presence on the other side of the Line of Actual Control (LAC), the official stated. : h7 ^. n4 K9 v2 f; Z" V3 w # i8 E2 y' n# u" j/ F% l' |, sThe Hindu reported on Wednesday that the clash took place after Colonel Santosh Babu, who was commanding the unit, dismantled a tent erected by the Chinese and later set it on fire. During the June 6 military level talks, the two sides decided to remove the tent. It has now emerged that the tent was destroyed two days before the June 15 clash. When Indian troopers were patrolling the contested site, the Chinese threw boulders on them and unleashed strong current of water by unblocking the rivulets.) V+ C) c" H$ X3 q# F/ [
% Z1 r0 q6 d. O4 q8 n- ]3 qThe Chinese were wearing body protecters, helmets and carried spiked batons, the official noted. 1 R" K% s) G9 {4 S5 ?4 P; b9 G$ W D* J$ F
MEA statement / I8 R( C) x# A8 J5 U# Q8 m, i4 c, n6 Y7 N, b& p6 m
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) had issued a statement that the “Chinese side took premeditated and planned action that was directly responsible for the resulting violence and casualties.”/ W. o6 V) ^) f' K. e6 y# N( Q8 @' l
; o8 |7 P* P2 i$ O+ cThe official said, “The patrolling team walked into an ambush. The area had witnessed clashes on May 5 and the attack took place despite a high alert. The men were outnumbered by the Chinese. No gunshot was fired., j$ z2 e. X* F
9 a- k" s3 R* o; S# iAs reported, some men “died on the spot” and the exercise to locate the missing bodies continued till late hours of June 16. As many as 20 Army personnel were killed and several injured. ; I" n U6 y7 Q+ j3 k( M! E( D d5 c# i
The Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP), deployed with the Army along the LAC, helped move the injured to the base camp the next day. An ITBP rescue team trekked 3-4 km the next day to evacuate the injured.7 V- d: y! l) T4 P3 Z
' v& O, r: Y$ f7 \& e9 s- H P* }5 eAt least 20 helicopter sorties from the base camp in Galwan were undertaken to evacuate the injured and retrieve the bodies./ n0 U1 d* H: B* [6 } 作者: grass 时间: 2020-6-19 11:00
现代版的水淹七军作者: 晨枫 时间: 2020-6-19 11:05
“不是我们无能，是共军放水了，我们站不住啊”作者: sweeter 时间: 2020-6-19 11:28
不管这篇文章是真是假，或者几成真几成假，结果是毫无疑问的，就是印军从装备到后勤到指挥能力到作战能力，都远不如共军。- T, M% m8 n: m2 I' a0 i" G' @
. L7 d/ U- V6 t& z4 ^8 f
最好笑的就是哈佛那篇文章刚发，就被啪啪打脸了。堪称史上最快打脸。作者: 孟词宗 时间: 2020-6-19 12:10
空营计反劫营，拦河水淹敌兵。这不是活脱脱的《三国演义》的桥段嘛。作者: aniu 时间: 2020-6-19 12:38
"The patrolling team walked into an ambush." --- hehe, 从1962年开始一直中埋伏作者: moletronic 时间: 2020-6-19 13:07
说了半天也不提冲突地点在实控线中方一侧，这时应该实行德州法律。作者: 鳕鱼邪恶 时间: 2020-6-20 15:05
又有人说兔子拦河是帮助阿三寻尸？