爱吱声

标题: 棉花 [打印本页]

作者: indy    时间: 2020-4-23 11:30
标题: 棉花

https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-and-the-laboratories-in-wuhan-11587486996?mod=e2fb










SKIP TO MAIN CONTENTSKIP TO SEARCHSkip to...Select















SUBSCRIBE
SIGN IN


Enter News, Quotes, Companies or Videos








CORONAVIRUSFree Resources
LIVE UPDATESSYMPTOMSWHO'S HIRINGYOU ASK, WE ANSWERSTATE LOCKDOWNSDAILY LIFETESTING AND TREATMENTDAILY VIDEO BRIEFINGEN ESPAÑOL





















Coronavirus and the Laboratories in WuhanTheir researchers travel to caves across China, where they capture live bats to study viruses.



By Tom Cotton

April 21, 2020 12:36 pm ET









The Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, April 17.PHOTO: HECTOR RETAMAL/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

The U.S. government is investigating whether the Covid-19 virus came from a government laboratory in Wuhan, China. The Chinese Communist Party denies the possibility. “There is no way this virus came from us,” claimed Yuan Zhiming over the weekend. Mr. Yuan is a top researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which studies some of the world’s deadliest pathogens. He is also secretary of the lab’s Communist Party committee. He accuses me of “deliberately trying to mislead people” for suggesting his laboratory as a possible origin for the pandemic.

Beijing has claimed that the virus originated in a Wuhan “wet market,” where wild animals were sold. But evidence to counter this theory emerged in January. Chinese researchers reported in the Lancet Jan. 24 that the first known cases had no contact with the market, and Chinese state media acknowledged the finding. There’s no evidence the market sold bats or pangolins, the animals from which the virus is thought to have jumped to humans. And the bat species that carries it isn’t found within 100 miles of Wuhan.

Wuhan has two labs where we know bats and humans interacted. One is the Institute of Virology, eight miles from the wet market; the other is the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, barely 300 yards from the market.








–– ADVERTISEMENT ––



[backcolor=transparent !important][backcolor=transparent !important]






Both labs collect live animals to study viruses. Their researchers travel to caves across China to capture bats for this purpose. Chinese state media released a minidocumentary in mid-December following a team of Wuhan CDC researchers collecting viruses from bats in caves. The researchers fretted openly about the risk of infection.


WSJ NEWSLETTERWhat's News

A digest of the day's most important news to watch, delivered to your inbox.



I would also like to receive updates and special offers from Dow Jones and affiliates. I can unsubscribe at any time.I agree to the Privacy Policy and Cookie Notice.
[url=]SIGN UP[/url]



These risks were not limited to the field. The Washington Post reported last week that in 2018 U.S. diplomats in China warned of “a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate” the Institute of Virology. The Wuhan CDC operates at even lower biosafety standards.

While the Chinese government denies the possibility of a lab leak, its actions tell a different story. The Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the Institute of Virology in January. In February Chairman Xi Jinping urged swift implementation of new biosafety rules to govern pathogens in laboratory settings. Academic papers about the virus’s origins are now subject to prior restraint by the government.

In early January, enforcers threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus. Among them was Li Wenliang, who died of Covid-19 in February. Laboratories working to sequence the virus’s genetic code were ordered to destroy their samples. The laboratory that first published the virus’s genome was shut down, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported in February.

This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure, but it all points toward the Wuhan labs. Thanks to the Chinese coverup, we may never have direct, conclusive evidence—intelligence rarely works that way—but Americans justifiably can use common sense to follow the inherent logic of events to their likely conclusion.

Mr. Cotton, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Arkansas.

Opinion: A Communist Coronavirus

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE



UP NEXT










0:00 / 1:41














Opinion: A Communist Coronavirus





Wonder Land: The coronavirus is a metaphor for two political ideas that are incompatible with the realities of the modern world: China’s Communist Party and isolationism. Image: Noel Celis/AFP via Getty Images

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8










Join the Conversation

Become a WSJ member today and share your voice with our community of journalists and members.


VIEW OPTIONS


SHOW CONVERSATION(1022)




JOIN THE CONVERSATION






WSJ PROMOTION
Uncertain Times Call for Trusted Facts

During this uncertain time, lean on WSJ's vital, original coverage of today's stories and their impact on everything from the economy to politics, culture and daily life.

SAVE 50% TODAY
















SPONSORED OFFERS







RECOMMENDED VIDEOS



MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
















[url=]BACK TO TOP[/url]

Edition




WSJ Membership BenefitsCustomer CenterLegal Policies




SIGN IN
© 2020 Dow Jones & Company Inc.
All Rights Reserved.














作者: indy    时间: 2020-4-23 11:32





欢迎光临 爱吱声 (http://129.226.69.186/bbs/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2