热度 1|
This is a list of questionable, scholarly open-access publishers. We recommend that scholars read the available reviews, assessments and descriptions provided here, and then decide for themselves whether they want to submit articles, serve as editors or on editorial boards. The criteria for determining predatory publishers are here.
We hope that tenure and promotion committees can also decide for themselves how importantly or not to rate articles published in these journals in the context of their own institutional standards and/or geocultural locus. We emphasize that journal publishers and journals change in their business and editorial practices over time. This list is kept up-to-date to the best extent possible but may not reflect sudden, unreported, or unknown enhancements.
Last updated June 2, 2014
Appeals: If you are a publisher and would like to appeal your firm’s inclusion on this list, please go here.
GMT+8, 2024-11-24 21:20 , Processed in 0.030350 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.
Powered by Discuz! X3.2
© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.