注册 登录
爱吱声 返回首页

东海后学的个人空间 http://129.226.69.186/bbs/?17103 [收藏] [复制] [分享] [RSS]

日志

英国政府怎么了?准备后事吗?

热度 28已有 1755 次阅读2018-1-12 13:23

这也是在西西河里看到的笑话,不确定真伪啊:
-------------------------------------------
《卫报》报道,英国政府承认,英国国家档案馆中有关福克兰战争、北爱尔兰冲突和“季诺维也夫信”等事件的数千份文件已经不慎遗失。

人权组织称,这些文件可能是侵犯人权行为的证据,要求英国首相特雷莎·梅展开搜索行动,把文件找回来。

据报道,英国国家档案馆内数千份关于该国20世纪最具争议事件的政府文件,在被公职人员取阅后,随后他们宣称文件已经不慎遗失。

报道举例指出,英国内政部拒绝就取走“季诺维也夫信”的原因以及信件什么时候、如何遗失进行说明,同时也未表示文件是否有副本。

“季诺维也夫信”是一封传闻以苏联革命家季诺维也夫的名义寄给英国工党的信件,呼吁英国左派积极开展颠覆活动的宣言。这件事后来被认为是英国反共力量指使MI6对英国左派的栽赃陷害,成为政府丑闻。

其他文件包括福克兰战争的文件,北爱尔兰运动的秘密文件,英国在印巴殖民时期在巴基斯坦做病毒抗体实验的文件,与阿根廷发生武装摩擦时的一些内部文件等,都是非常棘手的文件。

“季诺维也夫信”文件是丢失的最完整的文件,所有文档一页不剩全部遗失,其余文件大都属于一些分页遗失,加起来有成百上千份文件。

由国家档案馆移交政府后被标注为“遗失”的其他文件中包括有关英共在“冷战”最盛时期行动的文件,以及可以证明英国政府侵占俄罗斯政府财产的文件。这些财产在1917年10月革命后保存于英国银行中。

这次文件遗失事件,再加上不久前国防部不慎遗失的关于和沙特的军售文件,英军特种部队在印尼的行动文件和英国军队的私刑使用文件事件,令一些专家担忧政府是不是在以遗失为借口掩盖事实。不过英国国防大臣已经做出官方回应,国防部没有做出掩盖历史的行为。

英文的原文链接:


Government admits 'losing' thousands of papers from National Archives

Documents on the Falklands, Northern Ireland’s Troubles, and the infamous Zinoviev letter among those ‘misplaced’, leaving historians suspicious

Thousands of government papers detailing some of the most controversial episodes in 20th-century British history have vanished after civil servants removed them from the country’s National Archives and then reported them as lost.

Documents concerning the Falklands war, Northern Ireland’s Troubles and the infamous Zinoviev letter – in which MI6 officers plotted to bring about the downfall of the first Labour government - are all said to have been misplaced.

Other missing files concern the British colonial administration in Palestine, tests on polio vaccines and long-running territorial disputes between the UK and Argentina.

Almost 1,000 files, each thought to contain dozens of papers, are affected. In most instances the entire file is said to have been mislaid after being removed from public view at the archives and taken back to Whitehall.

An entire file on the Zinoviev letter scandal is said to have been lost after Home Office civil servants took it away. The Home Office declined to say why it was taken or when or how it was lost. Nor would its say whether any copies had been made.

In other instances, papers from within files have been carefully selected and taken away.

Foreign Office officials removed a small number of papers in 2015 from a file concerning the 1978 murder of Georgi Markov, a dissident Bulgarian journalist who died after being shot in the leg with a tiny pellet containing ricin while crossing Waterloo Bridge in central London.

The Foreign Office subsequently told the National Archives that the papers taken were nowhere to be found.

After being questioned by the Guardian, it said it had managed to locate most of the papers and return them to the archives. A couple, however, are still missing. The FO declined to say why it had taken the papers, or whether it had copies.

Other files the National Archives has listed as “misplaced while on loan to government department” include one concerning the activities of the Communist party of Great Britain at the height of the cold war; another detailing the way in which the British government took possession of Russian government funds held in British banks after the 1917 revolution; an assessment for government ministers on the security situation in Northern Ireland in the early 1970s; and three files about defence agreements between the UK and newly independent Malaya in the late 1950s, shortly before the two countries went to war with Indonesia.

The disappearances highlight the ease with which government departments can commandeer official papers long after they have been declassified and made available to historians and the public at the archives at Kew, south-west London.

A Freedom of Information Act request in 2014 showed that 9,308 files were returned to government departments in this way in 2011. The following year 7,122 files were loaned out, and 7,468 in 2013. The National Archives says Whitehall departments are strongly encouraged to promptly return them, but they are not under any obligation to do so.

“The National Archives regularly sends lists to government departments of files that they have out on loan,” a spokesperson said. “If we are notified that a file is missing, we do ask what actions have been done and what action is being taken to find the file.”

Some historians have been particularly distrustful of the Foreign Office since 2013, when the Guardian disclosed that the department had been unlawfully hoarding 1.2m historical files at a high-security compound near Milton Keynes in Buckinghamshire.

The hoard came to light during high court proceedings brought by a group of elderly Kenyans who were detained and abused during the Mau Mau insurgency in 1950s Kenya, when the Foreign Office admitted it had withheld thousands of colonial-era files.

A few years earlier, the Ministry of Defence refused to consider a number of files for release under the Freedom of Information Act on the grounds that they may have been exposed to asbestos.

The files concerned such matters as arms sales to Saudi Arabia, UK special forces operations against Indonesia and interrogation techniques. The MoD denied it was using the presence of asbestos in an old archive building as an excuse to suppress the documents.


2

膜拜

鸡蛋

鲜花
1

路过
20

雷人

开心
1

感动
1

难过

刚表态过的朋友 (25 人)

发表评论 评论 (6 个评论)

回复 猫元帅 2018-1-12 18:25
《抓间谍的人》说的到底是不是真的?
回复 月近天心 2018-1-12 19:37
“令一些专家担忧政府是不是在以遗失为借口掩盖事实”
专家好聪明啊,看得这么深刻啊
回复 老兵帅客 2018-1-12 20:45
  
回复 MacArthur 2018-1-12 23:59
但是不得不承认,档案工作英国人还是做得最好 -- 我们的档案“遗失”情况如果爆出来,那简直都没法提了。。。
回复 青青的蓝 2018-1-15 13:42
  
回复 nukearchie 2018-1-15 17:59
英国是该丢的都丢了,不该丢的都在。中国是丢了什么还有什么,应该有什么都不清楚。

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

您需要登录后才可以评论 登录 | 注册

手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|网站错误报告|爱吱声   

GMT+8, 2024-11-5 14:57 , Processed in 0.036145 second(s), 18 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

返回顶部